In Kenya ,the art of governing entails giving people not what they want , but what they will learn to want.

Even more extensive political participation is deemed desirable it’s argued to be impractical,direct or participatory.Democracy requires millions of citizens to make all important decision yet if the masses cannot be trusted because they are so emotional and ignorant , why allow them to even choose who governs? The argument against direct democracy is logically an argument against any kind of democracy. The commitment of elites to democracy is weak .Even representative democracy is conceded only on grounds of expediency. This allows for the possibility that democracy would be dispensed with altogether if another way could be found to pacify the masses demands.
The attacks against the masses competency have often been made prior to extensions of participation,rights to workers , women and minorities.
The majority of individuals in liberal democracies are passive recipients of elite decisions rather than citizens who actively shape politics . This is a dangerous state of affairs because participation is a necessary precondition for our freedom. Democratic values are provisionally optional and conditional and a means to exclusively individualistic and private ends . Instead strong democracy is something done by , not to . citizens. This means strengthening local government and extending democracy practice into the institutions of civil society, as well as increasing opportunities for the use of national referendums and citizen – led policy initiatives . In a strong democracy participation is not merely the defense of an entrenched interest, but instead is a deliberative and public process that doesn’t lay claim to any truth above what can be agreed consensually by its citizens.
For instance in Kenya we have democratized elitism.

Democratic candidates from the parliament who face daunting historical odds have been running for the same seats for decades now . Many of these leaders have been implicated in major scandals while in power but still are able to contest for these seats and must win with a majority of votes. For many years masses have been manipulated by these leaders into voting them into office despite historical evidences of their abuse of office . Some of this leaders quit the government only to join new political parties and pretend to be very clean from scandals and gun up support from the masses in order to be voted in ; this issue have led to what I could refer to as recycling of leaders even though we have able young people who can lead the country better.
During the 2005 constitutional referendum in Kenya , decisions on which constitution was best for the country was dominated by elites. Political leaders and other powerful leaders were used to interpret the proposed constitution to the masses .Citizens were not given enough time to read through the book and come up with their own decision .

Campaigns , were even held by these leaders some of whom misinterpreted the proposed constitution in order to manipulate the masses into either voting against or for the proposed constitution. Masses were voting even when many of them didn’t understand why and what they were voting for or against Decisions such as these ones should be left to the masses. Further more those who were used to come up with the constitution were elites who came up with laws and statements which would suit their interest. The views of the common ‘wananchi’ were not considered in the final draft of the constitution. The government in place came up with a draft which would help them hold onto power for long against the wishes of the masses.
Matters concerning educational policies have also been democratized by the elites. Educational policies are formulated without sometimes consulting the relevant stakeholders in the educational sector . In the recent past policies on issues such as free primary education and secondary education have been politicized and hasty decisions made during political campaigns in order to lure citizens into voting the various leaders into office . Such policies are implemented without critical analysis of their viability.
Insufficient funds are often allocated for implementation of such policies leading to lack of staff in form of teachers which in turn leads to high student – teacher ratios in school

Free Primary Education.
hence affecting the overall quality of the education offered consequently degrading education standards in the country. Such matters should be left to those who are concerned or involved directly with education to plan,analyze and implement the policies in order to ensure everything necessary is done to ensure success rather than letting politicians seek political munition in shoddy setups.
In Kenya decisions on how to govern the nation have only been assumed by the elite. Enactment of different laws and amendments of various sections of the law is drafted and passed in the parliament without consulting the masses who will be affected by these changes despite calls by the people that certain bills passed by the parliament not be signed by the president the president goes ahead and signs such bills into law.

Recently the worthy contested bill on gagging the media was signed into law by the president after being passed by the parliament despite calls by the media stakeholders and citizens at large for him not to sign it – such activities have led to reduced freedom of citizens to express themselves freely. Members of parliament pass laws which only suit their personal interests without taking care of the people’s wishes about how they should be governed.
Those who venture into politics only do this as a means to achieve a more important end of maintaining political authority and don’t have the interests of those they are representing at heart. Most of these politicians have accumulated riches through dubious and corrupt means and in order to protect their status and wealth they vie for political seats.Through politics such individuals will use it as a tool to further their interests. During political campaigns such individuals will pledge lots of promises to those they want to represent but once they are elected they embark on siphoning wealth faster through corruption as the rest of the masses suffer due to increase poverty in the country as the politicians spend most of the government funds for their own personal interests.

Politicians have for along time used their power to influence the masses into involving themselves in disastrous activities just to meet their interests ,recently during the post-election violence in Kenya several leaders were involved in funding and organizing violence all throughout the country and the government was not left behind in misusing its forces to kill innocent civilian.

Lots of lives and property was lost during the skirmishes.
The key purpose for these politicians doing so was to satisfy their own interests of rising to positions of power at the expense of “wananchi” who suffered a lot.
Elections in Kenya have been merely an exercise which comes after every five years but it has failed to fulfill its purpose . The views of the people are not respected most of the time as the elections are made to favour certain candidates in power as seen in the last general election where the sitting president played foul.

This has limited the freedom of people to express themselves on who should govern them. Politicians assume that masses cannot be trusted because they are emotional and ignorant and should not be allowed to even choose who should govern them.

Generally democratic elitism in Kenya is evidenced by cases where those few in power use all means to ensure that they remain in power. They do this through manipulation and sometime even through coercion. They make decisions on behalf of the masses but in most cases these decisions only go along way in fulfilling their own personal interest and not those of the masses. Such few leaders have accumulated lots of riches while the masses languish in absolute poverty.

Decisions concerning matters such as education, agriculture, economics, finance or the budget are always made without consulting the people who are to be affected by such decisions, sometimes any decisions made by the public are dropped and only the news of elites are considered.
This is the Kenya we live in and and the one i want to change.
May God help Kenya.
I must say you reasoning and examples have come out very strong save for a few elements that i don’t agree with.
Duncan,for your rich poems and articles, you deserve respect.
From my look of things,Kenya is a state that is starting to grow now,we have never been growing,the poll violence must have regenerated the growth hormones and changes have started coming for instance we have very many women MPs and i trust that it is only they who will salvage our country because the felt the pain and the load in 9months.
Did anyone ask themselves why all of a sudden PNU MPs became ODMs bedmates? if whatever has ever happened in Parliament is anything to go by? Kiraitu (energy minister) defended Ruto since he knew his case was somewhere in the periphery. I do not have any problem with whoever becomes a friend of who but at least important issues should be given the kind of focus they deserve. So the youth its our time to get the Kenya we want who said if its not Kibaki’s, Kenyatta’s or Odinga’s family that the country’s clock will stop to tick?
We need to start this change with ourselves. To do the right thing all the time even/especially when no one is watching. In time, sufficient numbers of upright citizens should be achieved to tip the balance in favor of an upright Nation.
Do we have the will? Allow me, Duncan, to use your article as an example...
..The opening paragraphs of your article are the copyrighted works of another published author to whom you have not made any attribution. You surely ought to know that it is the proper and right thing to do. Are you infringing on his property rights just because he might not find out and/or sue you?... This easily translates to our new-found local jargon: culture of impunity.
To paraphrase Michael Jackson, this change has to start with the man in the mirror.
Let me ask you,if Harun Lumiti is a writer with Newyork times and not many people read Newyork times and i use some of his words here to stress my point,am i trying to enhancing the culture of impunity?
Mr.Lumiti,i produce music,luckily or unluckily i am not known,i am an underground artiste but my music is all over however small it may be,it is spread by piracy,my point here is that without the piracy my music would be nowhere because nobody would market me,still my message will be spread to many and this is what is African Brotherhood,when we speak with one voice and understand each other from the begining noting where we have come from,we (Me and you) can still share a slice of bread and avert hunger even if the piece of bread belongs to you,this does not mean i will be denying you your right of eating your bread.
Harun Lumiti you disgust me day after day.
I have read your articles,’Unfit for the Nobel Peace Prize ’ and ’
Why is This Woman So Eager to Circumcise Her Kinsmen? ’
In them i have discovered only one thing with you,you never want to give other people credit,you are a man who thinks for himself by himself with himself.
I have never seen someone who is such selfish as Harun Lumiti
Harun,you have to think what drives you,as much as we all here have personal stands,i don’t know which extra agenda you have,did you come here to pull down other committed writers down?Or are you here to prove that you are the best?why then not write?
I hate to say this but i won’t be tired in telling you this,you are not fit for dialogue,discussion or call it what you may,you are a dictator who is misplaced.
Duncan,just know that we are here with you,we will always support you here even if at times we disagree Dan,we are with you,i personally love your poems and your choice of topics,for a long time i have been following your writing and i have discovered you have an extra liking for issues that affect peace,i have read your blog the peace makers and that only supports my claim.
Keep up the good work Duncan,just ignore the stereotype in Harun Lumiti.
”Kawango Agot is clearly getting bolder with every dollar she pockets by preying on the fears and gullibility of her kinsmen. One hopes she’ll still have her you-cannot-intimidate-me wits about her when the excitable folks wake up to find their foreskin missing for no good reason. ”
I don’t like the way you have attacked Professor Agot here,she being a woman i will defend her and i will also defend her because she is a woman who has earned her status.
You are just one of the many men i would love to hate,you don’t see the good things done by people or intended by people but you want to think using your corrupt minds basing on wrong assumptions settle your personal egos and likes with dislikes.
Shape up my brother.
”Kawango Agot is clearly getting bolder with every dollar she pockets by preying on the fears and gullibility of her kinsmen. One hopes she’ll still have her you-cannot-intimidate-me wits about her when the excitable folks wake up to find their foreskin missing for no good reason. ”
I don’t like the way you have attacked Professor Agot here,she being a woman i will defend her and i will also defend her because she is a woman who has earned her status.
You are just one of the many men i would love to hate,you don’t see the good things done by people or intended by people but you want to think using your corrupt minds basing on wrong assumptions settle your personal egos and likes with dislikes.
Shape up my brother.
When a person doesn’t like the shine on something they try to tarnish it -thinking it makes them shine more
You still look shiny to me!
To me Duncan is just as shiny as he was yesterday.
I have been in here long enough to as one question;Who does Harun Lumiti think he is.
As a writer you ought to know that infringement of other people’s copyright is unlawful. It is widespread, yes, but that does not make it lawful.
You decry the disregard for the law and other ills that are rampant in our country and state that you intend to change that. I agree and intend to support you. But I insist that we cannot change the wider society if we ourselves continue to do things the wrong way (morally and legally). This starts with the things we consider ’little’ or ’inconsequential’. It is all about the principle, not the magnitude. To say that your plagiarism is excusable because it was just a few paragraphs is to adopt the same mentality as the MPs who refuse to pay their taxes because ”even if we are taxed, it will amount to only 800million”. Or like the maize racketeers who say ”it is only 100,000 bags which was mishandled”.
The book I refer to is Political Sociology - A Critical Introduction by Keith Faulks.
Even more extensive political participation is deemed desirable it’s argued to be impractical,direct or participatory.Democracy requires millions of citizens to make all important decision yet if the masses cannot be trusted because they are so emotional and ignorant , why allow them to even choose who governs? The argument against direct democracy is logically an argument against any kind of democracy. The commitment of elites to democracy is weak .Even representative democracy is conceded only on grounds of expediency. This allows for the possibility that democracy would be dispensed with altogether if another way could be found to pacify the masses demands.
The attacks against the masses competency have often been made prior to extensions of participation,rights to workers , women and minorities.
The majority of individuals in liberal democracies are passive recipients of elite decisions rather than citizens who actively shape politics . This is a dangerous state of affairs because participation is a necessary precondition for our freedom. Democratic values are provisionally optional and conditional and a means to exclusively individualistic and private ends . Instead strong democracy is something done by , not to . citizens. This means strengthening local government and extending democracy practice into the institutions of civil society, as well as increasing opportunities for the use of national referendums and citizen – led policy initiatives . In a strong democracy participation is not merely the defense of an entrenched interest, but instead is a deliberative and public process that doesn’t lay claim to any truth above what can be agreed consensually by its citizens.
The portions appear as paragraphs between pages 145 and 147 of the online edition at the links below.
First paragraph
Second paragraph
Of course no one is barred from reading or commenting on other peoples work. But you were not commenting on anyone’s work as you have presented it all as yours. And that is dishonesty, like it or not. You want to side-track into ”settling of issues” that don’t even exist when the right thing to do is simply make an attribution!
It is about respecting other peoples’ rights, whoever they are, wherever they are. I thought this is the change you’d welcome.
Why should I challenge your genuineness or commitment? Because this failure by the citizenry to interrogate and audit aspiring leaders has largely contributed to the current state of poor governance. If at the individual level we can disregard the law that protects another individual, why would we do so when we get to positions that control the machinery of law?
Look at Mathew’s remarks condoning piracy! How can acceptance of theft possibly fit in the agenda for change? To promote piracy is to disregard the law with utter contempt. This is the kind of mind-set that makes our search for change ever more difficult.
I maintain that this drive for change must start at the individual level. And I cannot shy away from using your example, or Mathew’s, as immediate examples just for the sake of...”african brotherhood”. Lets be bold enough and honest as we confront these issues if we are to stand a chance of salvaging our country.
Sometimes the law kills people,the same law denies people food,let me ask you for example,isn’t Kenyan fake laws that limit trade for instance,if i wanted to sell my CDs or any small business,isn’t it the same law that has put many expenses in terms of license and so on before one product hits the shelves comfortably without interference from City council askaris?
I do not call out for people to venture into piracy,i mean that in the act of piracy,some voiceless peolple are heard and more still the jobless get something to feed their empty stomachs as the sell the pirated CDs.
For as long as many citizens cling to this twisted belief that it is okay to break the law when doing so is to their favor, then our quest for reforming our country is futile.
Local Opinions (33)
I must say you reasoning and examples have come out very strong save for a few elements that i don’t agree with.
Duncan,for your rich poems and articles, you deserve respect.
From my look of things,Kenya is a state that is starting to grow now,we have never been growing,the poll violence must have regenerated the growth hormones and changes have started coming for instance we have very many women MPs and i trust that it is only they who will salvage our country because the felt the pain and the load in 9months.
Did anyone ask themselves why all of a sudden PNU MPs became ODMs bedmates? if whatever has ever happened in Parliament is anything to go by? Kiraitu (energy minister) defended Ruto since he knew his case was somewhere in the periphery. I do not have any problem with whoever becomes a friend of who but at least important issues should be given the kind of focus they deserve. So the youth its our time to get the Kenya we want who said if its not Kibaki’s, Kenyatta’s or Odinga’s family that the country’s clock will stop to tick?
We need to start this change with ourselves. To do the right thing all the time even/especially when no one is watching. In time, sufficient numbers of upright citizens should be achieved to tip the balance in favor of an upright Nation.
Do we have the will? Allow me, Duncan, to use your article as an example...
..The opening paragraphs of your article are the copyrighted works of another published author to whom you have not made any attribution. You surely ought to know that it is the proper and right thing to do. Are you infringing on his property rights just because he might not find out and/or sue you?... This easily translates to our new-found local jargon: culture of impunity.
To paraphrase Michael Jackson, this change has to start with the man in the mirror.
Let me ask you,if Harun Lumiti is a writer with Newyork times and not many people read Newyork times and i use some of his words here to stress my point,am i trying to enhancing the culture of impunity?
Mr.Lumiti,i produce music,luckily or unluckily i am not known,i am an underground artiste but my music is all over however small it may be,it is spread by piracy,my point here is that without the piracy my music would be nowhere because nobody would market me,still my message will be spread to many and this is what is African Brotherhood,when we speak with one voice and understand each other from the begining noting where we have come from,we (Me and you) can still share a slice of bread and avert hunger even if the piece of bread belongs to you,this does not mean i will be denying you your right of eating your bread.
Harun Lumiti you disgust me day after day.
I have read your articles,’Unfit for the Nobel Peace Prize ’ and ’
Why is This Woman So Eager to Circumcise Her Kinsmen? ’
In them i have discovered only one thing with you,you never want to give other people credit,you are a man who thinks for himself by himself with himself.
I have never seen someone who is such selfish as Harun Lumiti
Harun,you have to think what drives you,as much as we all here have personal stands,i don’t know which extra agenda you have,did you come here to pull down other committed writers down?Or are you here to prove that you are the best?why then not write?
I hate to say this but i won’t be tired in telling you this,you are not fit for dialogue,discussion or call it what you may,you are a dictator who is misplaced.
Duncan,just know that we are here with you,we will always support you here even if at times we disagree Dan,we are with you,i personally love your poems and your choice of topics,for a long time i have been following your writing and i have discovered you have an extra liking for issues that affect peace,i have read your blog the peace makers and that only supports my claim.
Keep up the good work Duncan,just ignore the stereotype in Harun Lumiti.
”Kawango Agot is clearly getting bolder with every dollar she pockets by preying on the fears and gullibility of her kinsmen. One hopes she’ll still have her you-cannot-intimidate-me wits about her when the excitable folks wake up to find their foreskin missing for no good reason. ”
I don’t like the way you have attacked Professor Agot here,she being a woman i will defend her and i will also defend her because she is a woman who has earned her status.
You are just one of the many men i would love to hate,you don’t see the good things done by people or intended by people but you want to think using your corrupt minds basing on wrong assumptions settle your personal egos and likes with dislikes.
Shape up my brother.
”Kawango Agot is clearly getting bolder with every dollar she pockets by preying on the fears and gullibility of her kinsmen. One hopes she’ll still have her you-cannot-intimidate-me wits about her when the excitable folks wake up to find their foreskin missing for no good reason. ”
I don’t like the way you have attacked Professor Agot here,she being a woman i will defend her and i will also defend her because she is a woman who has earned her status.
You are just one of the many men i would love to hate,you don’t see the good things done by people or intended by people but you want to think using your corrupt minds basing on wrong assumptions settle your personal egos and likes with dislikes.
Shape up my brother.
To me Duncan is just as shiny as he was yesterday.
I have been in here long enough to as one question;Who does Harun Lumiti think he is.
As a writer you ought to know that infringement of other people’s copyright is unlawful. It is widespread, yes, but that does not make it lawful.
You decry the disregard for the law and other ills that are rampant in our country and state that you intend to change that. I agree and intend to support you. But I insist that we cannot change the wider society if we ourselves continue to do things the wrong way (morally and legally). This starts with the things we consider ’little’ or ’inconsequential’. It is all about the principle, not the magnitude. To say that your plagiarism is excusable because it was just a few paragraphs is to adopt the same mentality as the MPs who refuse to pay their taxes because ”even if we are taxed, it will amount to only 800million”. Or like the maize racketeers who say ”it is only 100,000 bags which was mishandled”.
The book I refer to is Political Sociology - A Critical Introduction by Keith Faulks.
Even more extensive political participation is deemed desirable it’s argued to be impractical,direct or participatory.Democracy requires millions of citizens to make all important decision yet if the masses cannot be trusted because they are so emotional and ignorant , why allow them to even choose who governs? The argument against direct democracy is logically an argument against any kind of democracy. The commitment of elites to democracy is weak .Even representative democracy is conceded only on grounds of expediency. This allows for the possibility that democracy would be dispensed with altogether if another way could be found to pacify the masses demands.
The attacks against the masses competency have often been made prior to extensions of participation,rights to workers , women and minorities.
The majority of individuals in liberal democracies are passive recipients of elite decisions rather than citizens who actively shape politics . This is a dangerous state of affairs because participation is a necessary precondition for our freedom. Democratic values are provisionally optional and conditional and a means to exclusively individualistic and private ends . Instead strong democracy is something done by , not to . citizens. This means strengthening local government and extending democracy practice into the institutions of civil society, as well as increasing opportunities for the use of national referendums and citizen – led policy initiatives . In a strong democracy participation is not merely the defense of an entrenched interest, but instead is a deliberative and public process that doesn’t lay claim to any truth above what can be agreed consensually by its citizens.
The portions appear as paragraphs between pages 145 and 147 of the online edition at the links below.
First paragraph
Second paragraph
Of course no one is barred from reading or commenting on other peoples work. But you were not commenting on anyone’s work as you have presented it all as yours. And that is dishonesty, like it or not. You want to side-track into ”settling of issues” that don’t even exist when the right thing to do is simply make an attribution!
It is about respecting other peoples’ rights, whoever they are, wherever they are. I thought this is the change you’d welcome.
Why should I challenge your genuineness or commitment? Because this failure by the citizenry to interrogate and audit aspiring leaders has largely contributed to the current state of poor governance. If at the individual level we can disregard the law that protects another individual, why would we do so when we get to positions that control the machinery of law?
Look at Mathew’s remarks condoning piracy! How can acceptance of theft possibly fit in the agenda for change? To promote piracy is to disregard the law with utter contempt. This is the kind of mind-set that makes our search for change ever more difficult.
I maintain that this drive for change must start at the individual level. And I cannot shy away from using your example, or Mathew’s, as immediate examples just for the sake of...”african brotherhood”. Lets be bold enough and honest as we confront these issues if we are to stand a chance of salvaging our country.
Sometimes the law kills people,the same law denies people food,let me ask you for example,isn’t Kenyan fake laws that limit trade for instance,if i wanted to sell my CDs or any small business,isn’t it the same law that has put many expenses in terms of license and so on before one product hits the shelves comfortably without interference from City council askaris?
I do not call out for people to venture into piracy,i mean that in the act of piracy,some voiceless peolple are heard and more still the jobless get something to feed their empty stomachs as the sell the pirated CDs.
For as long as many citizens cling to this twisted belief that it is okay to break the law when doing so is to their favor, then our quest for reforming our country is futile.
Global Opinions (2)
When a person doesn’t like the shine on something they try to tarnish it -thinking it makes them shine more
You still look shiny to me!
Don’t ever GIVE UP! I too, mourn my country. We citizens, although under ”democratic law”, failed our nation.
We were dumb, deaf, blind, and mute..We allowed corruption to take hold of every aspect of our nation..Still we slempt in a sweet, conforming, slumber..Drifting in blissful, ignorance..
We can no longer hise, and play dumb.. We can no longer claim blindness as our children are shot or kidnapped by drug cartels. We can no longer fane deafness as we hear our neighbors screams..The ”little bit of wronful doing that wasn’t hurting anybody” has now taken control of ournation..The monster we created, coddled and cooed id now slaughtering us, one by one..
Citizens must take stand!!!
In the words of the late J.F.K.:
”ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 












Don’t ever GIVE UP! I too, mourn my country. We citizens, although under ”democratic law”, failed our nation.
We were dumb, deaf, blind, and mute..We allowed corruption to take hold of every aspect of our nation..Still we slempt in a sweet, conforming, slumber..Drifting in blissful, ignorance..
We can no longer hise, and play dumb.. We can no longer claim blindness as our children are shot or kidnapped by drug cartels. We can no longer fane deafness as we hear our neighbors screams..The ”little bit of wronful doing that wasn’t hurting anybody” has now taken control of ournation..The monster we created, coddled and cooed id now slaughtering us, one by one..
Citizens must take stand!!!
In the words of the late J.F.K.:
”ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.”